Albena Stefanova – University of National and World Economy, Student Town, 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria
Georgi Zabunov – University of National and World Economy, Student Town, 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/tmt.2020.619
Keywords: English for Specific Purposes (ESP), Student engagement, Systemic-Structural Activity Theory (SSAT), Consumer engagement.
REFERENCES
Ashwin P., & McVitty D. (2015). The Meanings of Student Engagement: Implications for Policies
and Practices. In: A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, & P. Scott (Eds), The European
Higher Education Area (pp. 343-359). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
3-319-20877-0_23.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_23.pdf
Bedny, G., & Karwowski, W. (2007). A systemic-structural theory of activity. Routledge: CRC
Press.
Bedny, G., & Harris, S. (2005) The Systemic-Structural Theory of Activity: Applications to
the Study of Human Work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12 (2), 128-147. https://doi.org/10.1207/
s15327884mca1202_4
Bedny, G. Z., (2004), Preface, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science (Special Issue), 5 (4),
249–254.
Bedny, G., & Karwowski, W., (2013), Analysis of strategies employed during upper extremity
positioning actions, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 14 (2), 175–194.
Bedny, G., & Meister, D., (1997), The Russian Theory of Activity: Current Application to Design
and Learning, Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
Bedny, G., Bedny, I. & Karwowski, W., (2019), Applied and Systemic-Structural Activity Theories,
In G. Bedny, I. Bedny, (Ed.), Applied and Systemic-Structural Activity Theory: Advances
in Studies of Human Performance, Taylor & Francis Group, NY, 3 – 25.
Bender, W. (2017). 20 Strategies for increasing student engagement. Learning Sciences International.
Bloch, P. (1981). An Exploration Into the Scaling of Consumers’ Involvement With a Product
Class. NA – Advances in Consumer Research, 08, 61-65. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/
9786/volumes/v08/NA-08
Carter, D. (1983). Some propositions about ESP. The ESP Journal, 2, 131-137.
Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension
Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1086/209158
Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the
optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 121-
129.a
De Bot, K.D., Lowie, W. & Verspoor, M. (2005). Second Language Acquisition: An Advanced
Resource book. New York: Routledge.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00026-5
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström
& R. Miettinen & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 19-
38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., (2015), Learning By Expanding: An Activity Theoretical Approach To Developmental
Research, Cambridge University Press, Helsinki.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. & Paris, A. (2004) School Engagement: Potential of the Concept,
State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research 74, no. 1. http://www.isbe.net/
learningsupports/pdfs/engagement-concept.pdf.
Houston, M. J., & Rothschild, M. L. (1978). Conceptual and Methodological Perspectives on
Involvement. In S. Jain (Ed.), Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions
(pp. 184–187). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Kotler, P. (2000) Marketing Management, Millennium Edition (10th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-
Hall, Inc.
Krugman, H. (1965). The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement.
Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(3), 349–356.
Krugman, H. (1967) The Measurement of Advertising Involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly,
30(4), 583-596.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the Development of the Mind. Moscow: Progress.
Martin, J. & Torres, A. (2016). User’s guide and toolkit for the surveys of student engagement:
The High school survey of student engagement (HSSSE) and the Middle grades survey of
student engagement (MGSSE). National Association of Independent Schools, USA.
Richins, M. L., Bloch, P. H., & McQuarrie, E. F. (1992) How Enduring and Situational Involvement
Combine to Create Involvement Responses. Journal of Consumer Psychology, September,
143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80054-X
Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., Dalela, V., & Morgan, R. M. (2014). A Generalized Multidimensional
Scale for Measuring Customer Engagement. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 22
(4), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679220404
Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S.E., & Morgan, R.M. (2012), Customer Engagement: Exploring Customer
Relationships Beyond Purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20 (2),
127–149. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679200201
Windham, C. (2005). The Student’s Perspective. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds), Educating
the Net generation (pp. 5.1-5.16). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. http://www.educause.edu/
educatingthenetgen
Yasnitsky, A., (2018), Vygotsky: An Intellectual Biography, Routledge Abingdon, NY.